
1
@hamsteadbandit, I've heard of that plague of badly aligned rear triangles from the early SSes that were shipped to Britain. It seems like you guys got stuck with a bad batch, and that has unfortunately solidified a lot of opinions about Intense in general. Since that bad run, I believe Intense have brought all processes in-house and have improved their QC (and all their products) as a result. I've never seen this alignment issue with the SS or any other Intense frame I've worked on, so am suggesting that your experience is pretty specific to a particular manufacturing run, and not indicative of Intense as a company.
I've noticed a similar prejudice against Intense here in BC, riders tend to believe that they aren't strong enough to withstand the abuse of our tracks, and are really made for the flowier and much easier California riding style. My experience with Intense, as a professional mechanic as well as an owner of both the SS and SS2, is that they've behaved flawlessly and have developed zero problems. The SS was a great all-mountain bike, and the SS2 has proven to be an awesome do-everything go everywhere rocket, even more versatile (and built stronger) than the first version. Like any bike, they have their quirks - The coarse thread on the pivot bolts, for example, like to loosen up and should be checked every ride. I don't get Intense's insistence on using these bolts, all it would take is a change in thread pitch and the problem would be solved. In fact, why not make the mechanics really happy and use common chainring bolts like SC? My other complaint is the misnaming of the SS - anyone who rides slopestyle would never use one of these, so there's buyer confusion about intended use. Also not keen on sharing monograms with the Nazi Schutzstaffel, believe it or not. Are you listening, Jeff?
Aug 3, 2011 at 15:56
Can you leave the cellphone number to me?