/// STRENGTH IN NUMBERS FREE ONLINE PREMIERE           
mpathic
Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
Male / 90
Member Since: May 6, 2003
Info
Bike I ride: Intense SS
Products Recommended: none - View Products
Companies Supported: Fox Racing
Stats: Photos: 315 Photo Views: 40485
Videos: 4 Video Views: 15765
mpathic's Activity
mpathic commented under brule's blog ( Mar 19, 2012 at 11:51 )
mpathic commented under the-coastal-crew's blog ( Mar 1, 2012 at 11:56 )
quotes ^so true, LC was ruined by the melodramatic bullsh*t narration.
mpathic commented under dart-bikes's blog ( Feb 20, 2012 at 22:02 )
quotes I'm totally storked. Stroked! Stacked.
mpathic commented under mikelevy's blog ( Feb 20, 2012 at 1:30 )
quotes Tried Chain Reaction online? Outrageous price (not Chain reactions fault BTW) but here's the link: http://www.chainreactioncycles.com/Models.aspx?ModelID=55030 My solution to missing bolts has been to go to the local fastener dealer and get a slightly longer allen-head bolt that matches the thread. I've found that the longer bolts stay in without issue (though still make sure to loctite them)...also they cost like 50 cents apiece instead of 30 bucks!
mpathic commented under mikelevy's blog ( Feb 15, 2012 at 15:58 )
quotes 2 I don't blame anyone for being gun-shy due to negative experience, or hearing about other people's experience- I wouldn't touch an Evil frame, for example, after hearing the horror stories from almost everyone who bought a Revolt and subsequently had to (attempt to) deal with the Evil empire. (For everyone who wants a ride like the Revolt that works properly and is backed by an excellent company with a proper warranty department, buy the DeVinci Wilson.) Unlike Evil, whose Taiwan-made frames fetched a big boutique price and seemed to inexplicably fall apart during their intended use, Intense have kept their prices reasonable and competitive (at least here in North America they are on par with any other equivalent frameset made in the far east), done all their alu manufacturing at home, put out excellent product, and built an excellent reputation, in spite of some setbacks. Intense have remained committed to building frames in-house. The day that commitment changes is the day I look for another bike, which is what initially tuned me in to Intense - when Santa Cruz admitted that their frames were being made in Taiwan. I believe that Intense are going to continue to improve, and, unlike almost every other frame company, they will maintain their conviction that an excellent product can still be made in North America.
mpathic commented under mikelevy's blog ( Feb 15, 2012 at 15:57 )
quotes 1 @hamsteadbandit, I've heard of that plague of badly aligned rear triangles from the early SSes that were shipped to Britain. It seems like you guys got stuck with a bad batch, and that has unfortunately solidified a lot of opinions about Intense in general. Since that bad run, I believe Intense have brought all processes in-house and have improved their QC (and all their products) as a result. I've never seen this alignment issue with the SS or any other Intense frame I've worked on, so am suggesting that your experience is pretty specific to a particular manufacturing run, and not indicative of Intense as a company. I've noticed a similar prejudice against Intense here in BC, riders tend to believe that they aren't strong enough to withstand the abuse of our tracks, and are really made for the flowier and much easier California riding style. My experience with Intense, as a professional mechanic as well as an owner of both the SS and SS2, is that they've behaved flawlessly and have developed zero problems. The SS was a great all-mountain bike, and the SS2 has proven to be an awesome do-everything go everywhere rocket, even more versatile (and built stronger) than the first version. Like any bike, they have their quirks - The coarse thread on the pivot bolts, for example, like to loosen up and should be checked every ride. I don't get Intense's insistence on using these bolts, all it would take is a change in thread pitch and the problem would be solved. In fact, why not make the mechanics really happy and use common chainring bolts like SC? My other complaint is the misnaming of the SS - anyone who rides slopestyle would never use one of these, so there's buyer confusion about intended use. Also not keen on sharing monograms with the Nazi Schutzstaffel, believe it or not. Are you listening, Jeff?
mpathic commented under BigTimber's blog ( Feb 2, 2012 at 12:17 )
quotes Thank the trailbuilding Gods that we've moved on! I'm glad I got into riding when the gratuitous teeter totter skinny log ride ladder bridge slow technical trail was not the main focus. This is what progression is all about - skills have evolved, trailbuilding has evolved, riders have evolved. We haven't become "one-dimensional lift jockeys", our skills have just expanded. Wooden builds will always be part of our trails, they're just a lot more fun to ride now. No question, it's definitely beneficial to be humbled by an old school trail like Ladies for example - but even on that trail, who doesn't think that Digger's new Monster is way more fun than what was there before? The forest will always reclaim the builds. And hopefully, we'll be there to re-interpret the flow in a new and fun way.
mpathic commented under rb716's blog ( Jan 9, 2012 at 7:23 )
quotes Good points for sure. I'm definitely not trying to say that all is sunshine & roses on the shore, it's just that there has been some collaboration and some forward movement, and hopefully those successes will show the way for other areas.
mpathic commented under rb716's blog ( Dec 31, 2011 at 13:30 )
quotes Just to throw something positive in the mix, here in BC there is not only tolerance (generally) but now we're seeing trails officially sanctioned/supported by park services in some areas. There are always the absurdly fierce opponents to trailbuilding, but the hope is that the 'rest of the world' will see that it's possible - and beneficial - to have great, well-maintained, awesome trails on shared land. Meanwhile, you can't blame the landowner for objecting to people being on his property any more than you can blame him if you injure yourself. To call a land owner selfish or whatever just because he doesn't want a bunch of people he doesn't know on his land is ridiculous. The whole idea of private property is that it's private. Go to the land owners and ask if it's OK to build first. If they're an asshole about it, go somewhere else. Otherwise you're pissing in the wind. No one can expect to be happy about having their property trespassed, so put some effort into it and maybe you can change the person's (or council's) negative view of trailbuilding/mountain biking. It takes time for sure, but it's worth it. It's up to us to be ambassadors of the sport we love, instead of acting like a bunch of spoiled babies who didn't get their way. Unfortunately there's a reason why a lot of people have such negative views of mtn bikers - so we have to act differently to change that view.
Friends
NoteBoard
2263464
bikebike1234 wrote
Aug 3, 2011 at 15:56
I want your shock.
Can you leave the cellphone number to me?

1937598
Zevidiah wrote
Sep 30, 2010 at 4:26
Yeah, It kind of sucks Razz

1935932
Zevidiah wrote
Sep 28, 2010 at 13:27
Not yet, I got another scam e-mail about it but no legit offers yet.

1928114
Zevidiah wrote
Sep 20, 2010 at 16:14
LOL

1908474
Zevidiah wrote
Sep 1, 2010 at 15:39
Definately :S

1807054
BlackCrowe wrote
Jun 12, 2010 at 18:23
glad to hear it. You may be interested to know we added a small, steep down ramp to that feature 2 days ago.

1805363
BlackCrowe wrote
Jun 11, 2010 at 10:25
Thanks! How's the neck?

1650117
frank-callon49 wrote
Mar 12, 2010 at 11:50
Hello jOshua, can you give me a call; my name is frank callon. we bought a trailer from you last august and need your signature. urgent. 250 285 2460

Anonymous wrote
2 seconds ago

Copyright © 2000 - 2012. Pinkbike.com. All rights reserved.
dv43 0.127100